What Does the King v. Burwell Supreme Court Decision Mean for the Future of American Healthcare?

Posted by Yonas Dinkneh on Jun 25, 2015 2:06:00 PM

This Thursday, for the second time in three years, the Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. The Supreme Court ruled that Obamacare, President Obama’s landmark healthcare reform bill, may provide nationwide tax subsidies to low and middle class citizens seeking health insurance. The case King v. Burwell was spurred by a slight miswording of the original 900 page Affordable Care Act document where it stated that subsidies would only be available to those purchasing insurance “on an exchange by the state”. The health care law created marketplaces or “exchanges” where individuals could shop for their health care coverage plan. The lawsuit questioned if the 34 states that chose to maintain a federally-facilitated marketplace, as opposed to establishing a state-based marketplace, could receive essential tax subsidies necessary for affordable health care. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the majority opinion on the 6-3 decision, with the remaining three conservative Justices dissenting. 

Read More

Topics: Medicine & Healthcare

Welcome to Firecracker

Firecracker is an adaptive learning platform that uses amazing content coupled with spaced repetition to help medical students crush their exams. We offer programs for both individual students, and entire medical schools. If you'd like to learn more contact us at chat@firecracker.me.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts